Bosnia and Herzegovina win 56 percent, draw 24 percent, Qatar win 21 percent.
56%24%21%
Bosnia and Herzegovina 56%draw 24%Qatar 21%
predicted score 1-0 published consensus — logged Jun 24, 12:55 AM ET, pre-kickoff Graded: final 3–1 (Bosnia and Herzegovina win) · the logged call had it at 56% · Brier 0.297 (0 best · 0.667 coin-flip · 2 worst)
Pre-baked lean (June 11): Bosnia narrowly; counter-vs-possession asymmetry favors them.
Stakes
The table as it stands
After 6 matches in Group B: Bosnia and Herzegovina 3rd on 4 pts (1-1-1, -1 GD), Qatar 4th on 1 pt (0-1-2, -8 GD). Switzerland lead the group on 7 pts; both sit outside the top two (Bosnia and Herzegovina level on points, Qatar 3 pts back) — the best eight third-placed teams also advance.
† overall goal difference/goals separate Bosnia and Herzegovina / Canada (level on points and head-to-head).
Sweat Factor
How the heat stacks up
Actual · as of 2026-07-20 08:58 ET
~81°F · dry (36% RH) · WBGT 75.7°F
Moderate
Warm conditions (76°F WBGT) — a moderate physical test for both squads.
Bosnia and Herzegovina
+2.3°F vs home
Qatar
-16.1°F vs home
The Read
Tactical preview
The group's two ball-conceders, except one of them will finally have to take it. Qatar's possession identity makes them the default protagonist, which suits Bosnia perfectly — their deep 4-4-2 exists to absorb exactly this and release Bajraktarević and Džeko's hold-up into counters. Afif against a parked Bosnian block is a far harder life than Afif in transition; expect Bosnia to be the more comfortable side even with less of the ball.
Key Duel
Akram Afif vs Bosnia's two banks of four.
Watch For
Alajbegović's minutes; Demirović's pressing of Qatar's slow back line; Tabaković's super-sub pedigree.
Margin Notes
Bosnia's eight-nation youth-system squad vs a Qatar squad with one foreign-based player.
The Wire
What's being reported
Auto-gathered 2026-06-24 · every claim carries its source · relayed as reporting, not verified by the hub — click through before it bears weight.
model projection: 2.87 total goals · over 1.5 78% · over 2.5 55% · over 3.5 32%
Market odds versus the model: implied probability, our probability, and the edge per selection
Market
Selection
Odds
Implied
Ours
Edge
1X2
Bosnia and Herzegovina
-278
71%
56%
-15.5%
1X2
Draw
+450
18%
24%
+5.9%
1X2
Qatar
+750
11%
21%
+9.6%
Total goals
Over 2.5
-175
60%
55%
-5.3%
Total goals
Under 2.5
+135
40%
45%
+5.3%
Total goals
Over 3
-108
50%
42%
-8.1%
Total goals
Under 3
-110
50%
58%
+8.1%
Total goals
Over 3.5
+135
40%
32%
-7.6%
Total goals
Under 3.5
-179
60%
68%
+7.6%
Asian handicap
Bosnia and Herzegovina -1.5
-103
49%
37%
-12.1%
Asian handicap
Qatar +1.5
-114
51%
63%
+12.1%
Model lean · stale line
Qatar (1X2), model edge +9.6%
Under 3.5 (Total goals), model edge +7.6%
the model likes these, but the line is over 12h old (the book hasn't reposted), so they are not recorded until the price refreshes — an intra-day run logs it once it does.
Logged pick: Qatar @ +700 (draftkings), edge 8.9pp · settled lost for -1.00u · CLV -0.7pp.
totals under 3: model-priced edge +8.1% exceeds the 8% cap for uncorroborated markets (priced from our own score matrix, no consensus cross-check) — not recorded
spreads away 1.5: model-priced edge +12.1% exceeds the 8% cap for uncorroborated markets (priced from our own score matrix, no consensus cross-check) — not recorded
market snapshot Jun 24, 12:19 PM ET · DraftKings where quoted, else best of 5 US books, de-vigged multiplicatively · totals / handicap / BTTS are model-priced from the score matrix — the Opta overlay covers W/D/L only, and with no independent consensus check they clear a stricter 8% edge ceiling vs 15% for 1X2 · O/U 3 can push (P 22%) — probabilities and edge are per unit at risk; a push refunds the stake.